![]() It has over two million users across the globe. This software is ideal for home security, office surveillance, & staff/per monitoring. Any thoughts? I've attached the most recent log. Xeoma allowed me to remote access without extra charges or monthly service fees, is expandable depending on how many cameras or video inputs I need which is perfect for any future scaling needs. iSp圜onnect is a reliable surveillance solution that allows you to control your CCTV cameras from any corner of the world. When Xeoma starts I try to connect to the server setting the ip, port, and password, but it never seems to find the server. I found I don't get an error saying the config file already exists by deleting the config directory each time and have the docker container recreate it and reset the config vars. I made sure to correlate the beta parameter configuration var with the beta/release packages downloaded. I've tried both bridge/host and have used 16.12.26 圆4 MacOS client, 17.3.30 圆4 圆4 MacOS client, as well as 圆4 trial Standard. Hey thanks for building a docker image for Xeoma! I'm not able to connect to the server. I'm planning to pick up my 4th camera this week, then I'll have to decide what I want to do about licensing. It comes with a heat map for traffic visualization, VR integration, Tripwires, object counting, and much more. In other words, for my specific scenario, it just works better. iSp圜onnect provides alerts to users via email or SMS and comes with PTZ object tracking facilities. I also have a huge decrease in ram utilization. Note that the free version won't work, since it can't connect to the server.įor more information on usage, including how to connect your cameras: I liked it but I literraly air at 1 cpu usage with Xeoma in idle. You can try Xeoma for free using the trial version, but it will be somewhat crippled. The Mac and Windows versions are identical, but the iOS app doesn't let you configure things. The container will be available in community applications shortly.Īfter configuring and launching the container, download the software from their website for your computer. Blue Iris was routinely using 30-40% of a CPU, so I was happy that Xeoma had a docker-izable Linux server. ![]() For about a year I ran Blue Iris in a Windows VM, but after SageTV and AirVideo HD were running in containers, Blue Iris was the only thing left in the VM. ![]() I tried ZoneMinder, which was very clunky to use, and had very high CPU usage. It has low CPU usage (about 3% CPU when idle) and an easy-to-use user interface. Xeoma is surveillance software with a minimal CPU footprint and easy-to-use UI. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |